Résultats de recherche

Recrutement d'un consultant ou d'un cabinet en vidéographie en vue de la réalisation d'un film documentaire sur les réussites et les meilleures pratiques de curriculum des couples.

Request for the supply of dolls to be used during the facilitation of group education by the community health workers (CHWs) in the Burera Districts.

The Bandebereho  programme — meaning “role model”  in Kinyarwanda — continues to show remarkable, long-term impacts in Rwanda. A six-year follow-up study published in eClinicalMedicine  reveals that the programme not only reduces intimate partner violence (IPV)  and child physical punishment  but also improves maternal and child health, mental health, and couple relationships , demonstrating sustained transformation years after the intervention ended. ( Read the study ) About the Bandebereho Programme Co-developed by the Rwanda Men’s Resource Center (RWAMREC)  and partners, Bandebereho is a gender-transformative programme  engaging men and their partners to promote: Non-violent, respectful couple relationships Father engagement in caregiving and reproductive health Reduction of intimate partner and child violence Improved maternal and child health The programme consists of 15 participatory sessions  for couples that encourage reflection on gender norms, communication, decision-making, and caregiving responsibilities. Key Findings at Six-Year Follow-Up The six-year follow-up study assessed over 2,000 participants  (1,003 men and 1,021 women) who took part in the original trial (2013–2015). Compared to the control group, participants in the intervention group experienced: 1. Reductions in Violence Women  were significantly less likely to report physical, sexual, economic, and emotional IPV in the past year. Men and women  reported lower use of physical punishment with their children. The reductions in violence ranged from 16 percentage points for sexual IPV  to 21 percentage points for emotional IPV , with differences slightly smaller than at the 21-month follow-up but still substantial. 2. Health and Family Outcomes Contraceptive Use:  Men in the intervention group reported greater use of modern contraception. Women's reports showed a positive trend but were not statistically significant. Maternal Health:  Women attended slightly more antenatal care (ANC) visits , and both men and women reported increased men’s accompaniment to ANC visits . Mental Health:  Both women and men in the intervention group reported lower rates of depressive symptoms , and men reported less harmful alcohol use . 3. Relationship and Household Dynamics Greater sharing of childcare and household tasks , particularly among men. Men were less likely to make final decisions alone  regarding household income, expenses, and childbearing decisions; women's reports trended similarly. Women continue to spend more time on household tasks than men, highlighting the need for ongoing efforts to redistribute unpaid care work. Discussion and Implications The study demonstrates that Bandebereho’s short-term intervention produced long-lasting effects  on family violence, health, and relationships. Notably: The programme reduced IPV and violent child discipline six years later — longer than any other similar programme  evaluated globally. Emotional and economic violence , often overlooked in interventions, showed sustained reduction. Improvements in mental health, alcohol use, and couple communication  suggest that programmes targeting gender norms and relationship skills can have broad and enduring benefits. Some challenges remain: violence and gendered household inequality, while reduced, persist. This highlights the need for continued programming and adaptations, including greater focus on equitable distribution of household responsibilities. Bandebereho’s success underscores the importance of: Engaging both men and women  in interventions Addressing gender norms and power dynamics Focusing on the transition to fatherhood  as a transformative period The programme’s holistic approach — supporting parents in their couple and parent–child relationships — is likely key to the sustained impact. Next Steps and Research Opportunities Further research could explore: Individual trajectories of violence and behavior change over time Mechanisms behind improvements in child discipline and mental health Concordance between men’s and women’s reports on household tasks and decision-making Adaptation and scale-up of the programme in new contexts Acknowledgements and Funding This six-year follow-up study was made possible thanks to the women and men who participated , RWAMREC facilitators , and the team at Laterite Ltd.  Funding was provided by Echidna Giving Fund, Grand Challenges Canada, and the Oak Foundation . The writing of the manuscript was supported in part by Echidna Giving Fund and Wellspring Philanthropic Fund. Data Access:  Researchers may request access for secondary analysis by contacting KD ( K.doyle@equimundo.org ). Declaration of Interests:  Some authors were involved in the development and implementation of Bandebereho; funding for the study and related work was provided by philanthropic organizations. Conclusion The Bandebereho programme demonstrates that short-term, gender-transformative interventions with parents can achieve sustained reductions in family violence, improve health outcomes, and foster more equitable relationships six years later . By engaging both men and women, emphasizing the benefits of fatherhood, and addressing gender norms, the programme offers a model for long-term, scalable change. Read the full study:   eClinicalMedicine – Bandebereho Six-Year Follow-Up

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CONSULTANCY SERVICES TO INTEGRATE BANDEBEREHO DATA INTO THE EXISTING MONITORING, REPORTING SYSTEM, E-LEARNING AND DIGITALIZATION OF THE COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM OF RBC

The Paternity Leave Dialogue Report by RWAMREC, in collaboration with the Rwanda Civil Society Platform and the World Policy Analysis Center, explores and advocates for issues surrounding paternity leave in Rwanda. 24 July 2023

Coming from a GBV-response background in Sweden, I have listened to countless testimonies from women who have had their rights and integrity brutally and cold-heartedly taken away. Horrendous accountsinvolving the darkest actions of humankind, presented on a platter of broken hearts and desperate minds. The common denominator? These acts of utter violence were all perpetrated by men. Men who in one way or another refused responsibility and punished help-seeking behaviors. As months turned to years, my inner frustration slowly but steadily spilled over the entire male population like a bucket of ice cold contempt. It was as if I went through my days hearing the familiar voice from an Attenborough documentary exclaiming“Ah, the infamous male Homo Sapiens! It grows up to two meters tall. Carnivorous. Easily identifiable by its fragile ego. Wondrous at sight, but beware! It can lash out and kill at the smallest inconvenience.”And I couldn’t possibly wrapmy head around why non-violent men were not climbing the barricades of their friend circles, families, and communities roaring for change. My didactic observations concluded; men suck. Arriving at RWAMREC, a proud member of RWAMNET and the MenEngage Alliance was, in theleast, an apocalypse. It was as if I had entered through a Narnia-like portal to a dimension in which men and thunder hollered for justice and humbled themselves under the rain of women’s eternal plights. As my world-view turned like a Swedish meatball in a frying pan, the questions I silently carried on my lips for the first weeks were; does it really work? Can men change? As trivial as that, but tragically honest from a young woman’s perspective. My inner journey required three monthsof internship, a pinch of casual car-talks and cross-checks with ED and the Program Manager, a trip to Musanze-Eden of East Africa and crafted beer, and frightening amounts of ginger infused African tea. Then one day, as the bright Rwandan sun dawned in competition with my inner self, I could finally see it. I saw men fallen prey on their own selves, tripping over history of failed masculinities, and men refusing to accept the status-quo. Men who selflessly, genuinely, and for solid reasons spent overtime at the office and in the field. Personally convicted gender inclusive individuals who intelligently shared a feminist vision of social justice. It was virtually spiritual. Today, I identify as a reformed feminist, convicted and baptized into the MenEngageapproach. Not merely because I can back up my stances with miles of research material in my support, but also because I have courageously taken a step of faith to envision a future in which men and women can work together for change. When my former colleague back in Sweden called me for some regular updates the other week (new clients at the shelter, yes rape and beatings during pregnancy, yes revengeful former husband) she paused, inhaled for a second, and distrustfully asked the questions that apparentlylinger on many female minds. So, does it really work? Can men change? By now you know my answer. Written by: Anna Wiren Kigali, Rwanda

by Maria Francisca Gonçalves If gender is socially constructed through actions and norms based on cultural, biological and psychological interpretations, one could argue that discrimination as an act is one of its manifestations. And on the basis of gender, access to resources, power and control is determined as a result of roles, power relations, responsibilities, and expectations defined by gender norms. Since gender stereotypes are learned concepts, this means that they can also be unlearned or learned differently. Consequently, men’s ideas of what it means to be a man can change. However, for this change to occur, we need to engage men in addressing stereotypical ideas about what it means to be a man or a woman. The inclusion of young boys is also crucial, as gendered behaviours are shaped in childhood. Why does feminism need men? And why do men need feminism? First, because feminism isn’t a label, but an action, a movement to eliminate gendered oppression and promote gender equality. Feminism allows men and women to freely express their own individuality. Masculine perceptions are harmful both to men and women, such as: men are though, men need more sex, men are the breadwinners, men are head of the families, men are dominant, etc. One of the biggest challenges is that men are the main perpetrators of violent acts. So, accountability mechanisms should be strengthened and made available for women to report GBV. Yet men are too rarely seen as potential victims, allies, or participants in the effort to end violence. Therefore, it is important for RWAMREC to promote research and projects aimed at understanding how constructions of masculinities can contribute to cycles of violence, as perceptions of masculinity are also key barriers to women’s empowerment. Furthermore, understanding violence against women is incomplete if it does not include gendered practices that harm men and does not acknowledge that gender is also an issue for men. This recognition is key to creating long-term, sustainable gender transformation projects/programs, and this is where the MenEngage Approach and Alliance enters. It is important to clarify that the MenEngage exists in the form of a network of NGOs from the Global South and North that advocates men and boys for women’s rights, gender justice, LGBTQI rights, and social justice for all by promoting positive forms of masculinity. Alternatives to hegemonic masculinity that promote more inclusive, sympathetic, compassionate and egalitarian forms are referred to as positive masculinity. RWAMREC is an organization that works to promote these at country and regional level. RWAMREC has developed several theoretical models for behavioral change, primarily based on its main approach “the MenEngage”. One of the main strategies RWAMREC uses in its activities is the Journey of transformation model (JOT). This model engages couples in promoting gender equality, ending sexual and GBV in households, communities and workplace, while supporting women's economic empowerment. An excellent example of another gender-responsive intervention is curriculum-based interventions such as RWAMREC’s Bandebereho programme. The question that arises is: does this approach actually work? RWAMREC has conducted a study on the impact of the Bandebereho gender transformative couples’ intervention and has concluded that our findings, together with previous studies, suggest that culturally appropriate gender-transformative interventions with men and couples can be effective in changing deep-rooted gender inequalities and a range of health-related behavioral outcomes. RWAMREC research is thus already generating opportunities for future change by feeding research findings back to the communities and government partners and fostering entry points for new conversations about e.g. gender identity, roles and responsibilities and links to violence. In conclusion, feminism needs men, and men need feminism. Men from all social backgrounds should be intensively involved in programmes and campaigns to promote positive masculinity in the home and in everyday life. If men and boys are involved in changing attitudes towards women, then the prospect of building a more positive, responsible and safe environment is possible. This article is published in the following link: www.zeitschrift.frauensolidaritaet.org/ On the author: Maria Francisca Gonçalves is an intern at RWAMREC and is currently pursuing a masters in International Security at Sciences Po (Paris) with concentrations in Middle Eastern Studies and Diplomacy. She is also pursuing the Sciences Po's Gender Studies Programme, the Advanced Certification in Gender Studies. She enjoys all things MENA related and seeks to combine this with a passion for gender-transformative work.