Terms of Reference (ToR) - Provision of Consultancy Services to Conduct a Baseline and End-Line Assessment on Household Gender Transformation within the Kataza Project
- May 10
- 6 min read

1. Organizational Background
The Rwanda Men’s Resource Centre (RWAMREC) is a non-governmental organization committed to promoting gender equality through positive masculinities and male engagement approaches aimed at preventing gender-based violence (GBV) in Rwanda.
RWAMREC works across four key programmatic areas:
Community Empowerment and Sustainability
Peaceful and Healthy Families
Child Support and Youth Mentorship
Institutional Capacity Development
Diversity, inclusion, and gender justice are integrated as cross-cutting themes throughout all RWAMREC programs.
RWAMREC currently operates in 23 districts across Rwanda’s four provinces.
2. Kataza Project Context and Rationale
Despite Rwanda’s significant progress in advancing gender equality through strong national policies and institutional frameworks, gender inequalities persist at the household level. Unequal power relations, restrictive gender norms, and gender-based violence continue to undermine women’s agency, decision-making power, and access to economic opportunities.
The Rwanda MSME Financing Program, implemented by the Development Bank of Rwanda (BRD) under the Kataza Project, seeks to increase access to finance for small enterprises while ensuring that young women and families benefit from expanded economic opportunities.
Within this framework, RWAMREC integrates the Journey of Transformation (JoT), a gender-transformative approach designed to engage couples in dialogue and reflection on:
Gender norms
Shared decision-making
Household communication
Non-violent relationships
This is delivered through a structured twelve-week training curriculum.
Through this initiative:
Approximately 2,700 couples will participate in the JoT curriculum; and
A wider group of approximately 18,500 participants will be reached through the financial inclusion component of the Kataza Program across 15 districts.
Evidence indicates that financial inclusion alone does not automatically result in equitable household relationships or improved family well-being. Where restrictive gender norms and unequal power dynamics persist, economic empowerment interventions may fail to produce sustainable improvements and may even increase the risk of household conflict or GBV.
In this context, RWAMREC seeks to conduct:
A baseline assessment to establish the initial conditions of participating households and examine how financial access interacts with gender relations, household decision-making, and GBV risks; and
An end-line assessment to measure changes over time and assess the impact of the Journey of Transformation approach.
The findings from the baseline assessment will inform program implementation and establish benchmarks for measuring change. The end-line assessment will generate rigorous evidence on outcomes achieved, contributing to learning, accountability, and future program design.
3. Purpose of the Baseline and End-Line Assessment
The overall purpose of the assessments is to establish pre-intervention and post-intervention evidence on household dynamics, gender norms, financial decision-making, and GBV risks among couples participating in the Kataza Project.
Specific Objectives
The assessment aims to:
Establish baseline data on couples’ attitudes and practices related to:
Household decision-making
Economic management
Division of unpaid care work
Assess prevailing gender norms related to:
Women’s financial leadership
Asset ownership and control
Men’s participation in domestic responsibilities
Examine how access to finance interacts with:
Household gender dynamics; and
Risks of gender-based violence
Identify key enablers and barriers influencing whether financial access leads to equitable and cooperative household relationships.
Develop measurable indicators to assess the impact of the Journey of Transformation curriculum within the financial inclusion context throughout the project lifecycle.
Measure changes between baseline and end-line assessments to determine the outcomes and impact of the JoT curriculum among treatment and comparison groups.
Generate evidence on the added value of the gender-transformative approach and provide recommendations for:
Scale-up
Adaptation
Future programming
4. Scope of Work
RWAMREC seeks to engage a qualified consultancy firm or individual consultant to conduct both the baseline and end-line studies using a rigorous mixed-methods approach.
Study Design
The study will adopt a quasi-experimental design comparing:
Couples participating in the Journey of Transformation curriculum; and
Couples benefiting from financial access initiatives but not participating in the JoT curriculum.
This design will enable RWAMREC to:
Assess whether JoT contributes to improved gender relations beyond the effects of financial inclusion alone; and
Measure the magnitude of change between baseline and end-line.
Key Responsibilities
The consultant will work closely with RWAMREC’s MELI Manager to:
Finalize the study design and methodology for both assessments
Develop and refine quantitative and qualitative data collection tools
Train enumerators and supervise field data collection for both rounds
Conduct data cleaning, analysis, and interpretation
Produce a comprehensive baseline assessment report
Produce a comprehensive end-line assessment report, including comparative analysis of change
Present findings and recommendations to RWAMREC and project stakeholders
5. Methodology
Both the baseline and end-line assessments will use a mixed-methods research design, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection approaches applied consistently across both rounds to enable valid comparison.
5.1 Quantitative Survey
A structured household questionnaire will be administered digitally using KoBoToolbox.
To ensure confidentiality and reduce response bias:
Each partner (husband and wife/partner) will be interviewed separately.
The same questionnaire and protocol will be used during the end-line assessment to enable rigorous before-and-after comparison.
Survey Modules
The survey will include modules on:
Household demographics
Household decision-making and financial management
Gender norms and attitudes
Division of unpaid care work
Partner support and communication
Experiences and perceptions of gender-based violence
5.2 Qualitative Data Collection
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) will be conducted during both baseline and end-line phases to provide deeper insights into:
Gender norms and social expectations
Household communication and conflict resolution
Perceptions of financial empowerment
Barriers to equitable household practices
At the end-line stage, qualitative inquiry will additionally explore:
Mechanisms and pathways of change; and
How and why transformation occurred (or did not occur) at household level.
6. Key Deliverables
The consultant will be expected to deliver the following outputs:
6.1 Inception Report
Including:
Detailed study methodology and evaluation design for both phases
Data collection tools and sampling framework
Panel tracking and attrition management plan
Detailed work plan and implementation timeline
6.2 Refined Data Collection Tools
Including:
Household survey questionnaire
Focus Group Discussion guides
Enumerator training materials
6.3 Data Collection and Analysis
Including:
Supervision of field data collection
Data cleaning and validation
Statistical and thematic analysis of findings
6.4 Baseline Assessment Report
A comprehensive report including:
Baseline indicators and findings
Analysis of household gender dynamics and economic management
Gender norms and GBV risk analysis
Identification of barriers and enablers to equitable household practices
Recommendations for strengthening program implementation
6.5 End-Line Data Collection and Analysis
Including:
Supervision of end-line field data collection using the same tools and protocols as the baseline
Panel data tracking and attrition reporting
Data cleaning and validation
Statistical and thematic analysis, including difference-in-differences or equivalent comparative analysis
6.6 End-Line Assessment Report
A comprehensive report including:
End-line indicators and findings
Comparative analysis of change between baseline and end-line for treatment and comparison groups
Assessment of the added value of the JoT curriculum on household gender transformation
Analysis of equity, inclusion, and differential outcomes by:
Gender
Age
Geographic area
Key lessons learned and recommendations for future programming and scale-up
6.7 PowerPoint Presentations
Baseline Presentation
Summary of:
Key findings
Insights
Recommendations
End-Line Presentation
Summary of:
Key outcomes
Comparative findings
Strategic recommendations
6.8 Datasets
Baseline
Raw dataset
Cleaned/final dataset
End-Line
Raw dataset
Cleaned/final dataset
7. Qualifications and Skills
The consultant or consulting firm should possess the following qualifications:
A Master’s degree in:
Development Studies
Gender Studies
Social Sciences
Economics
Statistics
Public Policy
Or related fields
At least 10 years of proven experience conducting:
Research studies
Program evaluations
Gender equality assessments
Economic empowerment or GBV-related evaluations
Strong expertise in:
Quantitative and qualitative research methods
Survey design
Statistical analysis
Qualitative data analysis
Longitudinal and difference-in-differences analysis
Demonstrated experience in:
Gender-transformative programming
Male engagement approaches
Household-level research
Financial inclusion programs
Community development initiatives
Proven experience conducting:
Baseline and end-line evaluations
Panel data management
Attrition analysis
Excellent analytical and report-writing skills
Fluency in:
English
Kinyarwanda
8. Evaluation Criteria
Criteria | Score |
Methodology | 30 |
Work Plan | 10 |
Qualifications and Experience | 30 |
Financial Proposal | 30 |
Total | 100 |
Note: Any candidate scoring below 42 out of 70 (equivalent to 60%) in the technical evaluation will not qualify for the financial evaluation stage.
9. Duration of the Consultancy
The consultancy assignment will be conducted over a period of six (6) months:
Baseline Phase
June – August 2026(Approximately three months)
Activities include:
Inception
Data collection
Analysis
Reporting
End-Line Phase
January – March 2027(Approximately three months)
Activities include:
End-line data collection
Comparative analysis
Final reporting
The exact timing of the end-line phase will be determined in consultation with RWAMREC’s MELI Manager based on the implementation timeline of the program.
10. Procedure for Submission of Proposals
Interested candidates are required to submit the following documents:
Technical Proposal
A proposal outlining:
Proposed methodology
Work plan
Timeline for both baseline and end-line phases
Maximum length: 4 pages
Financial Proposal
A financial proposal covering both phases:
Maximum length: 1 page
Currency: Rwandan Francs (RWF)
Inclusive of all applicable taxes
Curriculum Vitae (CV)
Including:
At least two professional references
CVs of any additional consultants involved in the assignment
Sample of Previous Work
At least one example of similar work conducted previously, such as:
Evaluation reports
Research studies
Preferably involving both baseline and end-line components
Submission Details
Applications should be addressed to the Executive Director of RWAMREC and submitted electronically with the subject line:
“Baseline and End-Line Assessment on Household Gender Transformation within the Kataza Project”
Submission Address
RWAMRECYYUSSA Plaza, KimironkoTel: +250 788 315 140Email: info@rwamrec.org
Only complete applications submitted before 01 June 2026 will be considered.
Done at Kigali, 11 May 2026
Fidèle RUTAYISIREExecutive Director, RWAMREC




Baseline and end-line studies can give useful visibility into how projects affect households, and also how they help with ongoing community progress. Good planning, plus evaluation frameworks that are thought through, are what make “meaningful results” more than just a phrase. And in a lot of areas, whether you are dealing with social programs or a bank business plan consultant type of effort, success tends to hinge on clear objectives, solid analysis, and decisions that are made with a well-informed view, right through the whole process.